Thursday 5 January 2012

Public Enemies

Well, after a false start caused by the Stephen Lawrence verdicts it's finally arrived - a serious attempt at a probation drama. As Harry Fletcher from NAPO says, it's been a long-time coming since the last attempt 'Hard Cases' in the late 80's. I certainly cringed when I first got wind of the intended story line that involved a sexual relationship between young female officer and released 'lifer', but Harry reckons to have significantly altered the plot line to more accurately reflect true life. We'll have to wait to the end to find out, but surely for there to be any point in drama, it must reflect reality mustn't it?

Writing about probation by non-practitioners must be peculiarly difficult as it is so uncommon, and yet insiders have always known that the potential plot lines are vast and all-encompassing. We know author Tony Marchant had some help from NAPO and we're all smart enough to understand that in telling a story for tv you have to indulge in some 'compression' and even suspension of belief, but I really think the public needs to know that hell freezing over is rather more likely than a lifer being released to the area where the offence was committed. Yes I know it's an essential element of this plot-line and it will therefore serve the purpose of underlining just how sensible a policy it is when viewers see the mayhem caused by not following it. I just didn't want people thinking we really were generally that stupid.

As always, insiders will probably laugh and cringe in equal measure - did you see the size of that 'lifer' file? - and how about that interview for a first meeting? But this is tv drama and sadly I am familiar with some officers who might be better placed career-wise in an interrogation unit in some other government agency. It's not impossible to imagine a change of officer at the very point of release as any of us could succumb to a nasty accident, but I think most of us would hope that any officer finding themselves in such a situation really would put a bit more effort into building a rapport with their new client!

It would be nit-picking to point out things like a lifer would only be released from an open prison and would have already stayed at the hostel on ROTL, Release on Temporary Licence. I think the key thing for me has to be the degree to which a member of the public would be able to understand what is going on and the reasons for it. Realistically one episode, let alone three, cannot hope to capture the sheer breadth of issues and factors probation officers have to deal with on a daily basis. The stresses and strains, together with the subtleties and nuances of continually having to balance the needs for risk management and public protection with rehabilitation and positive development in their client. I think that's going to mean the BBC commissioning at least another series. 

Oh, and finally the cliff-hanger that Eddie is in fact innocent and took the rap for someone else is going to get a lot of prison officers laughing their socks off - I can hear them now "we've got whole wings who say that in here!"

     

6 comments:

  1. Not only did this drama do the probation service a great deal of harm with its inaccuracies but it was also fairly slow and tedious with every move being flagged up well in advance. I reckon NAPO would have been better off disclaiming it rather than claiming an advisory role. As you say probation work turns up many good stories and they do not all turn on a young female officer, apparently unfitted for her post and her supervisor not much better.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I too feel this drama has caused harm to the public image of the service. Birthday cakes in a cafe? It's not surprising that there is little public confidence in our ability to safely manage offenders.

    And although the building of effective relationships is key to managing risk there need to be boundaries in place and an understanding of the role of the OM. This drama did little to show the professional approach the majority of officers I work with demonstrate and clearly the character Anna Friel plays is not up to the job

    ReplyDelete
  3. What's the difference between an 'offender manager' & a probation officer? (both have negative connotations imho).

    I agree, this drama did little to dispel the mystery surrounding the work of the criminal justice social worker. I feel it could have added more to the debate if Eddie had been guilty with his humanity / vulnerabilty being portrayed & explored thereby highlighting the juxtaposition of the care v control function.

    I still believe it is important to build relationships with offenders to foster positive change in their lives. This will, in turn, assist with the public protection role (clearly not in every situation, sometimes the stringent external controls & authoritarian role are wholly necessary). I am aware some may view this as a somewhat naive stance.

    The 'birthday cake in the cafe' scene is not necessarily inappropriate if the boundaries of the relationship are clearly defined. Such interventions can add value to the efforts made to build rapport and trust. The alternative is often to leave the socially excluded 'offender' to ruminate and feel further isolated which may increase the potential risk posed. Don't underestimate the 'advise, assist & befriend' role, it can complement the 'challenge, change & protect' role.

    We as POs are also members of society & the communities in which we serve, therefore also potential victims of crime so it is in our interest to give our utmost in our daily role. Perhaps over simplistic, but true. Sometimes the popular media also forget that when we're being denigrated!

    Do we as a society believe in rehabilitation? Can we afford not to?

    Great blog Jim! Has provoked some considerable thought & reflection since I discovered it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Not sure why there are complaints on this particular programme when, over the years, the police have endured endless depictions so far removed from reality as to defy belief. Have a run through the checklist of left wing agenda to see how many you recognise.

    Black officer discriminated against by white officer, never the other way round.
    Woman held back by man discriminating against her because ‘he doesn’t think women should be in the job.’
    Women regularly the subject of sexist comments and hidden agenda, never the other way round.
    Women have a ‘glass ceiling’ but men do not.
    Women scrupulously fair to others and omni competent, but, rarely the men.
    White officer boorish
    Officers unable to tie ties and always leave top shirt button undone.
    Officers unable to recognise the law and believe that fitting up a suspect will never become known and will not be exposed at any time.
    Suspects are regularly stitched up and have no right of redress.
    Officers only work on one case at a time.

    And so forth. Jim this is an entertainment not a documentary. If you feel it does not reflect real life, welcome to the club. Television peddles its own agenda, not yours. Have a look at the inept Christmas Dr. Who touting acid rain and climate change (groan) and the female foliage being stronger and better organised that the male (sigh.)

    Don’t worry about it and get over it.

    Chris.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Chris,

    You make a good point and I agree to a certain extent. The trouble is poor old probation only gets a chance on tv every 20 years or so! No wonder it's still very much a 'secret' service, whereas the endless cop shows over the years have given great scope for lots of plot-lines good, bad, indifferent etc. Yes I'm sure much is often inaccurate and stereotyped, but have you looked at the comment section on Inspector Gadjet recently?

    Cheers,

    Jim

    ReplyDelete
  6. GADGET GADGET GADGET please…………

    I am not sure what your point is here Jim. Are all responders to blogs dimwits because…..

    You must have seen plenty of Old Bill in your time and do you seriously think they all conform to the witless nonsense portrayed on TV? I suppose I am iconoclastic by nature with a particular dislike for MP’s, pompous unknowing JP’s (who are the bane of the legal profession) and local authorities who have influence far in excess of their abilities. This will also extend to TV producers flogging their own particular line without regard to truth and accuracy, so you and I, like others, have to live with what is there.

    Did you really expect an accurate day-to-day appraisal of probation work, or some drama selling a fantasy line? I think the latter is more likely. Live with the inaccuracies matey, and do not worry about the rest. Truth will always be sacrificed for what may be a good story.

    Incidentally, if there is an emerging phase in this blog where sexual shenanigans are about to be revealed, then your viewing figures will definitely rocket.

    Keep smiling

    Chris

    ReplyDelete