Tuesday 1 November 2011

On the Run

The other night I found myself watching an episode of ITV's new investigative reporting programme 'Exposure' on i-player. Entitled 'On the Run' it was about the number of people who are subject to arrest warrants at any given time, either as a result of skipping bail, absconding from prison or disappearing whilst on licence.

I'll be honest and say I approached this self-imposed task with some trepidation because I'm not sure there's a huge story here, but actually ended up being quite enthused. Of course the vast majority are eventually brought to justice by being arrested for further offences and identified by DNA. But I think, quite unintentionally, the producers of this programme have just invented a whole new twist on a very familiar TV genre. The hypothesis of the programme was that there are countless thousands of dangerous people out there, the subject of unexecuted warrants and therefore escaping justice. Freedom of Information requests flushed out some seemingly alarming figures, but the star of the show, a former detective turned reporter, decided to illustrate the problem by trying to hunt down three fugitives from justice on camera.

We learned that in order to try and evade justice, two had jumped bail and left the country and a third had simply gone to ground having decided that the terms of his licence were too onerous. There was some half-hearted attempt at name changes, and cheekily two fugitives were continuing to openly use Facebook, with one taunting the police. I found it equally informative and hilarious that concerted efforts to snare them by means of 'honey traps' proved mightily difficult given their lackadaisical attitude to life, but the process was easily as enthralling as many of the now tired-looking police chase programmes we are so familiar with. 

So there we have it. A whole new idea for a show. There is an endless pool of gripping TV out there to be tapped into and it will be doing a useful public service at the same time. A sort of cross between 'Crimewatch', 'Rogue Traders' and 'Police, Camera, Action.' But with the police stretched and unable to put a great deal of time into trying to execute all the warrants outstanding at any given time, why not go a little further and follow the North American model by putting a bounty on their head? Another example of the big society - the public can monitor live security cctv via the internet, so could they be induced to get a little more actively involved I wonder?     

4 comments:

  1. More to the point, Jim, there is money to be made here. These chase programmes you describe could be income generating and Police Authorities could produce programmes that are networked at considerable profit. The profits from this could then be ploughed back into further 'spratt catching' and the whole process become at least self funding if not profit making. Trouble is, it would inevitably be privatised and we would every wannabe Joan Hickson, Angela Landsbury, David Suchet and Dick Van Dyke out there tendering for the work.

    And Anne Robinson could front it! Or Ann Widdicombe? Or Louise Casey? Anyone got Simon Cowell's number?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Rob,

    Ever thought we chose the wrong line of business?!

    Cheers,

    Jim

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have one person on licence who has been recalled, but still at large after a month - it will be interesting to see how long they last in the current climate of Police cutbacks. However, my personal ethics prevent me from organising a sweepstake!

    As for the TV programme - how about "I'm a licensee, keep me out of there!"?

    Linus

    ReplyDelete
  4. I was always quite taken with the cases who got themselves recalled back in the days when recall was more-or-less automatic if they missed three appointments but then continued to report. I never could find the CRAMS code for "Reported On Recall"

    ReplyDelete